

- PAUL EKMAN FACIAL ACTION CODING SYSTEM ANGRY HOW TO
- PAUL EKMAN FACIAL ACTION CODING SYSTEM ANGRY SERIES
- PAUL EKMAN FACIAL ACTION CODING SYSTEM ANGRY TV
FACS has played a particularly important role in predicting patterns related to deception at about 80% accuracy.Ĭreated in the 1970s by psychologists Paul Ekman and Wallace V. FACS has elucidated the physiological presence of emotion with very high levels of reliability. The Facial Action Coding System (FACS) is an internationally recognised, sophisticated research tool that precisely measures the entire spectrum of human facial expressions. Don’t watch the show for its accuracy, but it is fun to think that communications experts can be heroes, too – at least for 50 minutes one night a week.Question: What is Facial Action Coding System (FACS)? Answer:
PAUL EKMAN FACIAL ACTION CODING SYSTEM ANGRY TV
Incidentally, his expertise and work formed the basis of the recent TV show, Lie to Me, which portrayed a body-language expert solving crimes and stopping bad guys – surely a fantasy come true for those of us in communications. If there were Nobel prizes for communications, he would be the first recipient. Nonetheless, Ekman is a giant in the field and his contribution to our understanding of non-verbal communication is enormous. Is the person in the security line concealing anger because he wants to bring down an airplane, or because he’s running late and security lines are really irritating? Ekman’s work reveals a good deal about human emotions, but they still need to be decoded for their meaning. Unfortunately, while very helpful, it’s not enough to be able to detect that a particular person is concealing anger, say, unless you’re able also to figure out why that is the case. In other words, you’re sitting with someone who is smiling at you, but every now and then, he flashes a sneer of contempt for a very brief instant, revealing his true attitude underneath the more socially acceptable one.īoth the CIA and the FBI responded to Ekman’s with great interest, hoping that at last here was a way to detect liars, criminals and terrorists.

Through videotaping subjects in an effort to codify all their facial twitches, he and his team realized that people are prone to sudden, brief (less than a 20th of a second) flashes of expression that directly contradict the dominant expression.

Is that person angry at himself, or at us? Is that smile one of friendship or triumph? And so on.īut nonetheless his achievement was huge, because it gave us a detailed understanding of the possible ways that people can express themselves via the face, even if that didn’t necessarily reveal the thinking behind the expression.Īlong the way, Ekman discovered something else, his other great contribution to the study of non-verbal communication: micro-expressions. In a sense, Ekman failed in his goal to be able to read human intention, because of course knowing what emotion is being expressed doesn’t tell us necessarily the intent behind the emotion. First, the Facial Action Coding System, the first exhaustive analysis of all the expressions the face is capable of through detailed examination of all the possible ways that the muscles of the face can move and create expression. This need for safety led to Ekman’s two biggest contributions to the field of communications. That created in Ekman a desire to be able to read human emotion and thus intention, because he thought if he could tell that anger was on its way, he might be able to avoid it. His story begins with an abusive father, prone to unpredictable fits of rage and violence.
PAUL EKMAN FACIAL ACTION CODING SYSTEM ANGRY HOW TO
Start with his book Telling Lies, about his quest to discover how to detect lies and other human efforts at concealment. If you have any interest in body language or reading other people, then you need to know the work of Paul Ekman. The great business communicators can turn little companies into dominant ones and truly change the world. Leadership is tougher than ever – and more than ever about communicating well. Business communications are usually banal and boring and only occasionally riveting. Miscommunications are sometimes merely irritating, but sometimes fatal. I’m grateful to these people because understanding how we communicate is desperately important to bettering our humanity in both business and life.
PAUL EKMAN FACIAL ACTION CODING SYSTEM ANGRY SERIES
The series is personal and partial, but I welcome nominations for those you think I’ve missed. This blog is the fifth in a series of blogs on people that have added something important to the world of communications.
